Electrophysiological Effects of ABT-639 on Diabetic Neuropathy
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study of the Electrophysiology Effects of ABT-639 on Spontaneous Activity in C-Nociceptors in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
IRAS ID
95536
Contact name
Jordi Serra
Sponsor organisation
Abbott Laboratories Limited (Abbott)
Eudract number
2011-005127-40
ISRCTN Number
n/a
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
n/a
Research summary
We are conducting a clinical trial at our research centre for patients suffering from diabetic peripheral neuropathy. We want to test a potential new medicine known as ABT-639 to dampen neuropathic pain which occurs with diseases such as diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Patients suffering from diabetic peripheral neuropathy, may be aware that the current drugs on the market are not always effective in treating pain and may have undesirable side-effects. ABT-639 works in a different way to current marketed drugs and for this reason it may work better and have fewer side effects compared to the current drugs. Therefore in this study we will collect information on peripheral (links the brain and spinal cord to the limbs) nerve activity using a technique known as ??microneurography?? which will help us to determine how well ABT-639 is working. We will compare the effect of ABT-639 with lidocaine, which is a local anaesthetic infused directly into a vein, and is also used to treat neuropathic pain as it has an effect on nerve fibres which block pain so it will be used as a comparator. We will also be testing the safety and tolerability of ABT-639. The study will last for approximately 35 days including the time when we determine who is suitable for taking part in the study, and the telephone follow-up at the end of the study. Patients who receive ABT-639 or lidocaine may experience reduced pain. Volunteers will be compensated for their time.
REC name
South Central - Berkshire B Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
12/SC/0038
Date of REC Opinion
7 Feb 2012
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion