Efficacy and Safety of Octreolin for Acromegaly
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Efficacy and safety of oral Octreolin™ in patients with acromegaly who are currently receiving parenteral somatostatin analogs
IRAS ID
86317
Contact name
Marta Korbonits
Sponsor organisation
Medpace UK
Eudract number
2011-002912-10
ISRCTN Number
n/a
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
n/a
Research summary
Acromegaly is a rare disease causing bone, tissue and organ growth. This is due to the over production of growth hormones (GH) and insulin-like growth factors (IGF-1). The high levels of these hormones leads to a wide range of associated diseases affecting the heart and lungs, the levels of hormones released directly into the bloodstream and the metabolism. In many cases the reason for Acromegaly is due to a tumour on the pituitary gland, in the brain.Many of the current treatments of Acromegaly involve the use of injectable medicines called Somatostatin analogs (SSTa). This study aims to assess the safety and the effectiveness of a new formulation of one of these treatments - octreotide. This new formulation will allow people who suffer from acromegaly to swallow their medication instead of injecting it, this cannot be done at present since the acids present in the stomach prevent enough medicine being absorbed to make it an effective treatment for Acromegaly. This has been accomplished by using an enteric coated capsule filled with an oily suspension of octreotide formulated with a chemical called a transient permeability enhancer (TPE) - this complex formulation allows the medicine to pass through the stomach to the small intestine where the capsule disintegrates and the medicine is then absorbed. Based on results from 4 previous clinical trials where Octreolin has been given to 73 healthy female and male volunteers, Octreolin was safe and well-tolerated in all subjects. The side effects seen were similar to those for the Sandostatin (approved SSTa) control arms and to that reported for octreotide.
REC name
East Midlands - Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
11/EM/0320
Date of REC Opinion
11 Oct 2011
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion