Effects of online Metacognitive Training group on distressing beliefs
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Effects of online Metacognitive Training (MCT) group on persecutory delusions and cognitive biases in clients with first episode of psychosis.
IRAS ID
323885
Contact name
Kasia Wawrzyniak
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
City, University of London
Duration of Study in the UK
1 years, 2 months, 0 days
Research summary
Psychosis is described as disruptions to a person's beliefs and view of the world that make it challenging for them to establish what is a reality. Some people with psychosis experience persecutory delusions, which is a distressing belief that harm will happen to them by others.
Research indicated that certain errors in thinking (called cognitive biases, e.g.: jumping to conclusions) have been linked to psychotic symptoms in at high risk from psychosis. Studies reveal that certain errors in thinking may be causal factors for the development and maintenance of delusions.
National Institute of Health and Care Excellence recommends psychological interventions such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for a Psychosis (CBTp), but the efficacy of CBTp has been questioned, and small uptake by clients has also been discovered. This research is based on the metacognitive training delivered in groups, which is a psycho-educational programme targeting these thinking errors in psychosis. Research indicates that this training can be delivered online in a group to participants with psychosis, hence it offered a promising treatment approach in times of pandemic.The participants will be recruited from an Early Intervention in Psychosis service in Kent and will take part in a ten week MCT or Treatment as Usual (TAU). The MCT will consist of spending 90 minutes a week in a small online group setting working through a series of workshops. Participants will also be asked to complete homework each week and they will be supported with this. Interviews and questionnaires regarding symptoms and thinking errors will be used before and immediately after the intervention. The participants who attended the group and improved in their symptoms and thinking errors will be invited to an interview asking them what worked for them and how they found the group.
REC name
London - Surrey Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
23/LO/0512
Date of REC Opinion
2 Aug 2023
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion