Effect of a proposed Cav1.3 inhibitor in PA (v1)

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Effect of a proposed Cav1.3 inhibitor in primary aldosteronism – a pilot study

  • IRAS ID

    319634

  • Contact name

    Morris Brown

  • Contact email

    morris.brown@qmul.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Queen Mary University of London

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT05686993

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    -, -

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 8 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    Hypertension (high blood pressure) is a “silent killer” as it often does not cause symptoms but it leads to heart attacks and strokes. Up to 14% of people with hypertension have primary aldosteronism (PA), a condition that causes hypertension due to a hormone called aldosterone. This hormone comes from one or both adrenal glands. If PA is due to one adrenal gland, surgery to remove the gland can cure PA. If it is from both glands, specific drugs can be used to block aldosterone.
    There are some genetic changes in PA that can cause different physical features. One such mutation called CACNA1D can cause PA that appears to be coming from just one gland, but does not respond completely to surgery. This might be because CACNA1D causes PA that is actually affecting both adrenal glands but in an asymmetrical way.

    The problem with the CACNA1D mutation affects a calcium channel called Cav1.3. There is a medication called Cinnarizine that is already in use for vertigo and nausea. This medication has a structure that looks suitable to block the Cav1.3 channel. Calcium channel blockers are already in use for PA. We aim to evaluate the change in aldosteorne levels in people with PA treated with cinnarizine (proposed Cav1.3 inhibitor) and nifedipine (Cav1.2 inhibitor). This will allow us to evaluate whether the effect of calcium channel blockade on plasma aldosterone levels in people with PA is due primarily to Cav1.3 blockade.

  • REC name

    South Central - Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    23/SC/0080

  • Date of REC Opinion

    27 Mar 2023

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion