Diagnosis of herpes simplex keratitis

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Diagnosis of herpes simplex keratitis

  • IRAS ID

    196700

  • Contact name

    Stephen Kaye

  • Contact email

    s.b.kaye@liverpool.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Research Development & Innovation Governance

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 11 months, 2 days

  • Research summary

    Herpes Simplex Virus-1 (HSV-1) corneal ulceration (known as keratitis) is a leading cause of corneal blindness with an incidence of between 8.4 and 31.5 per 100,000 people.
    Although the clinical features of HSV-1 keratitis are characteristic, there are other diseases with similar features. There has also been an increase in HSV-1 resistance to antiviral agents. It is therefore to identify the virus for clinical management.

    Collection of samples from corneal lesions is conventionally undertaken using a swab (cotton tipped) or a blade to scrape the edges of the ulcer. Swabs are however, difficult to localise to edge of the ulcer and blades require expertise. Swabs very commonly come into contact with the conjunctiva and eyelid and may lead to non-specific results.

    An alternative method that has been shown to reliably diagnose bacterial infections of the cornea is to use small piece of filter paper known as a corneal impression membrane (CIM). It is superior to a blade,is simple to perform and less traumatic. It removes epithelial cells thus enabling the detection of intracellular microorganisms - which is important to detect HSV-1. It is easy to use and may be suitable for use by non-ophthalmologists. If a CIM could also be used to detect HSV-1 as well as bacteria, it would enable an efficient system to be introduced to identify the microorganism in cases of suspected microbial keratitis.

    A laboratory study has demonstrated excellent detection of HSV-1 from a CIM.

    The aim of this study is to compare the use of a CIM to a swab to detect and identify HSV.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/NW/0021

  • Date of REC Opinion

    15 Jan 2016

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion