Decision aid for orthodontic treatment. Protocol version 1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    From Compliance to Concordance in Orthodontic Treatment- Development of a Patient Decision Aid

  • IRAS ID

    122632

  • Contact name

    Abdussalam M Eddaiki

  • Contact email

    aeddaiki1@sheffield.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

  • Research summary

    Orthodontics is the dental specialty that corrects problems with the alignment of teeth (malocclusion) using orthodontic appliances or braces worn full time for up to three years. The success of orthodontic treatment is highly dependent on patient co-operation with most patients being young people aged 12 to 15 years accompanied by their parents. Orthodontic treatment is different from many other health care interventions because it is largely elective and takes place over a considerable length of time.
    In orthodontic treatment there is a need to improve patient-clinician interaction and the involvement of patients in decision-making. The development of a Patient Decision Aid (PDA) will facilitate shared decision-making and improve the experiences of patients. Therefore the aim of the study is to develop a Patient Decision Aid for children undergoing fixed (brace) orthodontic treatment.
    The PDA will be developed based on the framework produced by the International Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) collaboration. The project will involve two stages including; (1) PDA development, which will involve interviews and the formation of clinician and patient expert groups to help in the development and review of the PDA. (2) Evaluation of the PDA in a group of 50 new orthodontic patients aged 12-16 years old and their parents through questionnaires measuring decisional conflict, knowledge and expectations of orthodontic patients and their parents.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - Sheffield Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/YH/0166

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 Jun 2013

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion