Cross-over study with NVA237 vs tiotropium in early morning symptoms

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Multicenter, randomized, blinded, two-period cross-over study to assess the effect of glycopyrronium bromide (44 µg QD) versus tiotropium (18 µg QD) on morning activities and pulmonary function in patients with moderate to severe COPD

  • IRAS ID

    135909

  • Contact name

    Anthony Gunstone

  • Contact email

    a.gunstone@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    Novartis Pharma Services AG

  • Eudract number

    2013-002483-84

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT01959516

  • Research summary

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease is a disease of progressive airflow obstruction which affects approximately 20% of chronic cigarette smokers. It is a major cause of poor health and death worldwide and contributes significantly
    to health care costs and comorbidity.

    Tiotropium is the current standard of care for the maintenance therapy of moderate to severe COPD patients. However, some weaknesses of tiotropium are its 24h bronchodilator profile, showing some decreased activity in the before dosing hours, as well as a documented slow onset of action. Glycopyrronium is a LAMA currently approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the maintenance treatment of COPD patients. Both active drugs showed an equivalent efficacy and safety profile, but glycopyrronium appeared to have a faster onset of action versus tiotropium, with higher levels of bronchodilation in the four hours following administration of the drug in previous studies.

    Both NVA237 and tiotropium are long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) which are inhaled once daily. The trial is looking at the first hours after dosing and their impact on pulmonary function, COPD symptoms and ability to perform dailiy activities by the patient.

    The study will last for up to 100 days for each patient including two 28 day treatment periods. The aim is to recruit 120 patients in 4 countries in Europe (UK, Germany, Italy and Spain). In the UK, the aim is that approximately 36 patients will be randomised across 6 different sites.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/YH/0401

  • Date of REC Opinion

    6 Feb 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion