CReST2

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    CReST 2 - Colorectal Endoscopic Stenting Trial 2

  • IRAS ID

    215796

  • Contact name

    James Hill

  • Contact email

    james.hill@cmft.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    4 years, 7 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Up to 40% of patients who develop colorectal cancer are either not fit enough for resectional surgery or have advanced disease. Treatment in these patients is palliative and aimed at prolonging life and maximising its quality.

    A significant proportion of patients with colorectal cancer present as an emergency, where the cancer has caused a bowel blockage. Unless the blockage is relieved, the bowel perforates and the patient develops peritonitis. Surgery, if performed, is associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospital stay, increased stoma formation, reduced quality of life and patients are often unable to have chemotherapy.

    An alternative to surgery for patients presenting with an obstruction is stent insertion across the blocked part of the bowel. The stent is made of a special metal which expands when inserted. The procedure does not require general anaesthetic, and when successful, provides immediate relief of symptoms, avoiding the need for surgery and a stoma.

    When a stent is inserted into patients who are too unfit for major surgery or the cancer is too advanced for surgery, the stent is left in the patient indefinitely. Survival in these palliative patients is improving and about half the patients receiving chemotherapy will survive 18-24 months. Unfortunately, stent related complications are common, occurring in over one third of patients. Potential complications include bowel perforation, stent obstruction with recurrent blockage and stent migration. Two designs of stent are used in the UK; uncovered stents made of bare metal, and stents with a plastic covering designed to reduce the chances of stent blockage.

    Currently there is insufficient information comparing the two stent designs in terms of relative risk of complications of each stent design and outcome related to patient's expectations and quality of life.

    CReST2 will assess whether uncovered or covered stents are best for patients treated for palliation.

  • REC name

    North East - Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/NE/0027

  • Date of REC Opinion

    1 Feb 2017

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion