Comparison of two CPAP systems v0.1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Comparison of the Subjective Performance of a Novel Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) System With a Traditional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) System

  • IRAS ID

    194692

  • Contact name

    Alison Wimms

  • Contact email

    alison.wimms@resmed.com

  • Sponsor organisation

    ResMed (UK) Ltd

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT02535234

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 2 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) occurs when the airway partially or completely collapses during sleep. The treatment of choice for OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which acts as a positive airway splint by delivering a fixed pressure to the upper airway via tubing and a mask worn over the patients nose or mouse. ResMed is the manufacturer of CPAP devices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new (prototype) CPAP device, known as Monaco, to gain feedback on the usability and user preferences of the new device. Patients will be asked to use the new CPAP in their own home for a period of one week, and compare it to a standard CPAP (also used in the home for a period of one week) in a randomized cross over design.

  • REC name

    London - West London & GTAC Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    16/LO/0084

  • Date of REC Opinion

    26 Feb 2016

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion