COMBAT 1

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    COMBAT 1: COMputerised Bone Age Tool (Phase 1: Feasibility of Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry - DXA)

  • IRAS ID

    151016

  • Contact name

    Amaka Offiah

  • Contact email

    a.offiah@sheffield.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust

  • Research summary

    The Greulich and Pyle technique (G&P) is that most commonly used to assess bone age in children, particularly in the context of suspected skeletal dysplasia. However it has been shown not to be applicable to children of Asian and African ethnicity and may not be applicable to UK Caucasian children, who are now relatively more mature and larger than children of the mid 1930’s (when G&P was developed). It is generally agreed that updated standards are required for rapid and reliable bone age assessment. The development of such standards requires irradiation of normal children. To do this ethically, radiation exposure must be kept as low as possible. Two recent studies suggest that bone age assessment can be reliably achieved from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. As far as we are aware, the Tanner & Whitehouse (TW3) method, which is preferred by some (e.g. endocrinologists and nutritionists), has not been assessed from DXA scans - although not the main focus of this study, because of its popularity amongst certain specialties, we shall be assessing the TW3 method also. Modern techniques should not only be available as textbooks, but should also be available in digital (on-line) format and where possible integrated with hospital PACS systems. We believe that our team has the required experience and expertise to successfully carry out such a project. Before conducting the required large cross-sectional study, we must first confirm that DXA can in fact replace radiographs for bone age assessment in children; which is the objective of this current feasibility study.

  • REC name

    Yorkshire & The Humber - South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    14/YH/0124

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 May 2014

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion