Cold forceps polypectomy trial.
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Effectiveness of Cold Biopsy Forceps with pre-lift for complete resection of colonic polyps =7mm in size.
IRAS ID
166725
Contact name
Sam O'Connor
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Gloucestershire R&D Consortium
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 4 months, 4 days
Research summary
There is no consensus method for removal of diminutive(5mm)to small(6-9mm) colorectal polyps at colonoscopy. Neither the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy or the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have guidelines for the removal of these polyps, despite the fact that around 90% of lesions removed by polypectomy at colonoscopy are diminutive to small.
Multiple techniques are used for polyp removal, especially diminutive lesions. These include either forceps, both hot and cold, as well as snare with electrocautery or cold snare. Forceps utilises shearing force to grasp tissue and remove it, with the hot method passing a current through the grasper to essentially burn tissue. Snare is the use of a small metal loop placed and tightened at the base of polyps to cut through the tissue either straight away in a cold method or with electrocautery where a small current is passed through the loop to assist cutting through tissue. Surveys of Colonoscopists and Gastroenterologists in Australia and the United States show that the choice of method used for diminutive to small polyps is highly variable with cold snaring marginally favoured. Studies into polypectomy techniques are limited and it is clear that additional data and the review of polypectomy methods needs to be undertaken in order determine the optimal method for the removal of diminutive and small colorectal polyps.
A technique is used at the Gloucestershire NHS trust involving the submucosal pre injection with a standard solution then the use of cold forceps for removal of polyps =7mm. This appears to be both very safe and highly effective method for the removal of these lesions compared to other techniques. No formal published studies have been completed to evaluate this method at national and international levels. We propose a study to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and costs of this method.REC name
East Midlands - Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
14/EM/1316
Date of REC Opinion
7 Jan 2015
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion