Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Bipolar At Risk: A feasibility Study

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Cognitive behavioural therapy in comparison to treatment as usual in aduts at high risk of developing bipolar disorder (Bipolar At Risk): A feasibility study

  • IRAS ID

    163657

  • Contact name

    Sophie Parker

  • Contact email

    sophie.parker@gmw.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Greater Manchester Mental health NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 11 months, 30 days

  • Research summary

    Bipolar Disorder (BD) affects around 1% of the population. 1.14 million people met criteria for this condition in 2007. The World Health Organisation has identified BD as one of the main reasons for loss of life and health in 15–44 year olds, with a diagnosis of BD increasing the rate of suicide above the general population rate by 20-30 times. There is poor recognition of the disorder, especially in the early stages. People often experience misdiagnosis which causes frustration and disenchantment with services. Misdiagnosis can also lead to incorrect treatment which can make people's difficulties worse. BD also has financial costs; it is thought that the cost of BD in the UK for 2007 was £5.2 billion and likely to rise to £8.2 billion per year by 2026.

    People who experience symptoms of high and low mood and meet criteria for Bipolar At Risk (BAR) are considered to be at high risk of developing a full episode of BD. If these individuals are detected then interventions aimed at reducing these symptoms and associated distress may reduce the chance of a future full blown episode of BD. Early intervention for psychosis services have been successfully established throughout England. Extending early intervention to other mental health problems such as BD would be a major step forward in preventing long-term problems and their associated distress, disability and financial burden. The importance of developing interventions with a focus on health promotion and preventative interventions has long been recognised. However, evidence is required to test what treatments might best help this group. This study provides an investigation of a specific psychological intervention. This work fits with recent policy developments such as the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Programme for those with severe and enduring mental illness.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester East Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    15/NW/0336

  • Date of REC Opinion

    1 Jun 2015

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion