Clostridium difficile-specific biomarkers
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Development of Clostridium difficile specific biomarkers for detection of the organism in human clinical stool samples.
IRAS ID
138226
Contact name
Nigel Ternan
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University of Ulster
Research summary
Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive bacterium that in healthy individuals is relatively benign. However, antibiotic therapy can often disrupt the normal gut microbiota and in this situation, C. difficile can thrive. As a result of C. difficile’s ability to produce toxins that inflame the gut lining, C. difficile infection (CDI) leads to a range of symptoms ranging from fever, cramps and mild diarrhoea to pseudomembranous colitis and potentially life threatening toxic megacolon.
The most common methods used in hospitals for detecting C. difficile are enzyme immunoassays which detect proteins specific to C. difficile, such as glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), followed by confirmation of the presence of toxin A and/or B. and additional PCR tests to confirm presence of toxin genes in cases where patients present with low toxin titre. A single molecular assay that confirmed presence of toxigenic C. difficile would be of value. Therefore we believe there is a pressing need for the development of a rapid, toxin-independent, specific and sensitive one step multipoint test (OSMPT) for the presence of C. difficile.In previous work we identified 18 novel, toxin-independent biomarker genes unique to strains of C. difficile using PCR. Consequently we have selected the 8 strongest candidate biomarker genes and propose to test them on 500 archived stool samples (anonymised) which have a known clinical outcome (approximately 300 positive stool samples, 200 negative stool samples). As a direct consequence of the proposed work, we will be able to establish the predictive value of our novel biomarker targets for identifying C. difficile.
REC name
London - Queen Square Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
13/LO/1765
Date of REC Opinion
1 Nov 2013
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion