Closing the Gap: Focus Groups with Neuropsych Rehab Participants

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Closing the Gap: Focus Groups with Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Participants

  • IRAS ID

    253777

  • Contact name

    Andrew Bateman

  • Contact email

    andrew.bateman@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    1 years, 0 months, 1 days

  • Research summary

    Acquired brain injury (ABI), an umbrella term for all injuries to the brain that happen after birth, is an important health issue. With consequences of ABI being physical as well as mental, the need for adequate treatment is high. Over the years, many types of interventions aimed at rehabilitating or supporting people with acquired brain injury have been developed. To evaluate these rehabilitation programmes, we often use standard questionnaires. However, these do not always capture all the effects of a treatment programme (figure 1). Outcomes of holistic rehabilitation programmes, in particular, can be difficult to investigate because they tend to be personal and transcend traditional outcome domains, such as improved confidence and self-efficacy (a sense of being able to achieve important goals). Therefore, with this study, we would like to investigate former clients’ perspectives on participating in a holistic neuropsychological rehabilitation programme in more depth.

    User perspectives will be explored using focus groups. Focus groups are group interviews with a particular subject. Compared to one-on-one interviews, focus groups have the advantage of social interactions that can improve the outcomes of the group discussion. Participants will be former clients from different treatment groups. Participants will each join one focus group (2-3 hours). There will be four focus groups in total (figure 2). Focus group data will be clustered to identify things that could be done differently. Also, this study will give insights into how to improve the outcome measurement process.

  • REC name

    West Midlands - Solihull Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    19/WM/0059

  • Date of REC Opinion

    28 Mar 2019

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion