Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors as Antithrombotic Agents (CAIATA)
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors as Antithrombotic Agents (CAIATA): A prospective single centre controlled study investigating the antiplatelet potential of acetazolamide and methazolamide in adult acute glaucoma patients
IRAS ID
213199
Contact name
Alastair Poole
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
Head of Research Governance, University of Bristol
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 8 months, 28 days
Research summary
What is the purpose of the study?
This study will help work out whether glaucoma medication namely acetazolamide or metazolamide may be repurposed to control platelet mediated blood clotting disorders.What are blood platelets and how do they cause thrombosis or clots?
Platelets are small cells within the blood that are involved in the clotting mechanism. After an injury, healthy platelets become activated (switched on). This makes the platelets undergo dramatic changes in shape and ‘skin’ composition. These changes help them promote the formation of a clot that eventually stops the bleeding at wound sites.In some situations platelets can become activated when they should not be and this can lead to the formation of clots in important blood vessels, which may cause a heart attack or stroke. We now have a better understanding of why this occurs. In this study we aim to examine the possibility that glaucoma medications may actually help treat or prevent these events.
What research question are we trying to answer?
The study objective is to examine the antiplatelet effects of acetazolamide and methazolamide in adult glaucoma patients administered these drugs for short term treatment.We are conducting this study to address the initial question of whether acetazolamide or methazolamide exert an antithrombotic effect, at clinical doses, in humans. We may also be able to determine whether glaucoma drug is likely to provide advantage over aspirin and clopidogrel, currently used to manage clotting disorders. Positive information will provide a reason to progress the study to a broader study assessing these effects in more people.
REC name
East Midlands - Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
16/EM/0515
Date of REC Opinion
15 Dec 2016
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion