Can we make better use of patients’ time?

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Can we make better use of patients’ time spent in waiting rooms? A feasibility pilot study.

  • IRAS ID

    335811

  • Contact name

    Panagiota Founti

  • Contact email

    p.founti@nhs.net

  • Sponsor organisation

    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 9 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    The study will investigate whether it is feasible to collect additional data about a patient’s vision directly within the waiting room of an ophthalmology clinic, while the patient awaits their routine clinical appointment.

    The study will be conducted in the Glaucoma Virtual Clinic at Moorfields Eye Centre at Bedford Hospital. In this technician-led clinic patients spend on average 1 hour in the waiting area, while waiting to go from one test to another. Such time could potentially be used more efficiently to collect additional data (potentially improving both health outcomes and patient satisfaction). However, the feasibility/practicality of such an approach remains unknown.

    We will enrol 150 patients attending the above clinic. All participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire and a sight test examining their contrast sensitivity (ability to see faint objects). Half (N=75), selected at random, will perform the questionnaire and sight test (“SpotChecks”) using pen-and-paper. The other half (N=75) will perform the questionnaire and sight test using a digital tablet (“Pop Contrast Sensitivity Function - PopCSF)”

    In brief: “SpotChecks" is a 3-minute test in which the patient identifies ink spots of progressively decreasing contrast. "PopCSF" is also a 3-minute test, in which the patient presses on the screen to pop bubbles of varying contrast, as in a game. All participants will also be asked at the end to step into an annexe and perform a quick (60-second) reference measure (the "Pelli Robson" letter chart), for comparison with the in-waiting-room measures.

    The primary objective is to assess feasibility (how many patients completed the tests and how long it took them to do that). The secondary objective is to assess whether feasibility depends on the way in which the test is administered (pen-and-paper vs digital tablets).

  • REC name

    West of Scotland REC 1

  • REC reference

    24/WS/0012

  • Date of REC Opinion

    19 Feb 2024

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion