BRUISE CONTROL

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    BRUISE CONTROL : BRidge or continUe coumadIn for device SurgEry randomized CONTROLled Trial

  • IRAS ID

    48148

  • Contact name

    Kim Rajappan

  • Sponsor organisation

    Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust

  • Eudract number

    2010-024552-28

  • ISRCTN Number

    ISRCTN11629886

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    NCT00800137

  • Research summary

    Many cardiac patients requiring device (defibrillator or pacemaker) related surgery are on chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy (usually warfarin). The management of their anticoagulation around surgery presents a dilemma to physicians. This is particularly true in patients at highest risk of forming blood clots (thrombo-embolic events). On one side of the dilemma is the risk of blood clot formation related to stopping oral anti-coagulant therapy. On the other side of the dilemma is the risk of a pocket haematoma (blood collection) forming related to using bridging heparin therapy. The risk of pocket haematoma using bridging with heparin has been shown to be between 8 and 30.5 %. Developing a pocket haematoma can result in the following: require stopping of heparin with the risk of a blood clot elsewhere in the body; cause pain and can significantly prolong hospital stay; and sometimes re-operation is required. Re-operation within a few days of the initial implantation procedure can increase the risk of subsequent device system infection. Despite these risks, the accepted standard of care or routine treatment in most centres is to use bridging heparin therapy in patients with a moderate to high risk of forming blood clots. Recently in response to these issues a number of centres have explored the option of performing device surgery without stopping OAC. The purpose of the Bruise Control study is to compare the current accepted standard of care or treatment, (of bridging with Heparin), with a strategy where patients will continue on warfarin.

  • REC name

    South Central - Oxford A Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    12/SC/0061

  • Date of REC Opinion

    3 Dec 2012

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion