Balloon inflation and plaque morphology in revascularisation (BURST)
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Influence of Balloon inflation techniques and plaque characteristics on stent Underexpansion in percutaneous RevasculariSaTion (BURST)
IRAS ID
212423
Contact name
Simon Redwood
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
King's College London
Duration of Study in the UK
2 years, 0 months, 1 days
Research summary
Patients presenting with symptoms of coronary artery disease (e.g. chest pain – angina) are often treated with stents (referred to as percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI). Stents treat the cause of symptoms by improving blood flow to the heart muscle through expanding a narrowed, or diseased segment within a coronary artery. The procedure involves the inflation of a balloon to expand the stent inside the artery. As part of standard clinical care multiple balloon inflations are required during the procedure. Deficiencies in the expansion of the stent at the time of the procedure are associated serious complications such as stent blockages or re-narrowing of the artery, either of which may not occur until much later.
Improvements to the technique of stent expansion are therefore highly desirable to improve outcomes for patients. A number of factors are thought to influence the success of the procedure, including: the type of balloon used to inflate the stent, the pressure used and the duration of balloon inflation. Another important factor may be the mechanical properties of the narrowed segment of the artery (plaque) and how they interact with the stent. At present however, there is no consensus view and the practise of individual cardiologists consequently remains highly variable.
The aim of this study is better characterise relationship between pressure and duration of balloon inflation, type of balloon used and plaque properties during stent procedures using state-of-the-art imaging. Although assessment of each of these factors by a cardiologist is already included as part of standard care, our research protocol will focus the analysis into a systematic framework to allow conclusions to be drawn. The findings will used better inform cardiologists of the technical modifications that can help improve stenting procedures and translate to better outcomes for patients.
REC name
London - Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
16/LO/1818
Date of REC Opinion
12 Sep 2017
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion