B1481015 - Pfizer
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A PHASE 2B DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP, DOSE-RANGING STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY, SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF PF-04950615 FOLLOWING MONTHLY AND TWICE MONTHLY SUBCUTANEOUS DOSING FOR SIX MONTHS IN HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIC SUBJECTS ON A STATIN
IRAS ID
106727
Contact name
Anthony Wierzbicki
Sponsor organisation
Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017
Eudract number
2012-001226-10
Research summary
The purpose of this research study is to compare the effects of the study drug, PF-04950615 (RN316) and a placebo to find out which is better for treating high blood cholesterol levels. A placebo looks like the study drug but does not contain any drug. Researchers use a placebo to see if the study drug works better or is safer than not taking anything. PF-04950615 (RN316) is a new investigational drug. A new investigational drug is one that is currently not approved for sale in this country. PF-04950615 (RN316) may work to lower high blood cholesterol levels when given in combination with a statin medication by targeting a specific protein: PCSK9. There will be about 350 people enrolled in this study. The study is being done at about 150 different research sites in 3 countries. About 2 or more people will be enrolled at each site in the UK. This study will use competitive enrollment. This means that when a certain number oparticipants have entered the treatment phase of the study from all of the research sites combined, no more participants will be enrolled at any site. Each participant will be in this study for about 24 weeks. In one group of participants, PF-04950615 (RN316) will be administered monthly (every 4 weeks or 28 days) and the participant will need to visit the study site up to 21 times. In the other group, PF-04950615 (RN316) will be administered twice a month (every 14 days) and the participant will need to visit the study site up to 33 times.
REC name
HSC REC A
REC reference
12/NI/0119
Date of REC Opinion
10 Aug 2012
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion