AZD5363 in Patients with Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A Phase Ib Multicentre Study of AZD5363 Monotherapy to Assess Anti-Tumour Activity, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)(PYRUS)

  • IRAS ID

    112140

  • Contact name

    Simon Chowdhury

  • Sponsor organisation

    AstraZeneca UK Limited

  • Eudract number

    2011-004181-15

  • ISRCTN Number

    n/a

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    n/a

  • Research summary

    AZD5363 is a new anti cancer treatment being developed by AstraZeneca. This study is part of a research project for collecting information about the safety and effectiveness of this treatment for a variety of cancers. This study is investigating whether AZD5363 as monotherapy has the potential to provide an efficacy benefit in patients with mCRPC who have progressed on androgen-deprivation therapy pre or post-chemotherapy, in males 18 years of age and over. The main purpose of this study is to establish how metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) responds to the drug. The study will also gather information on how well it is tolerated, any potential side effects it may cause, and will measure the levels of AZD5363 in the blood and the action of AZD5363 in the body over a period of time. There are two parts to this study, Part A and Part B. Part A will investigate how AZD5363 affects mCRPC in men who have already had chemotherapy for their disease. Part B will investigate how AZD5363 affects mCRPC in men who have not had previous chemotherapy for their disease. In addition, both parts of this study will investigate how AZD5363 is absorbed into the blood stream and acts in the body, and how well it is tolerated by men with mCRPC. The duration of the study is expected to be approximately 24 months.

  • REC name

    London - Riverside Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    12/LO/1305

  • Date of REC Opinion

    9 Oct 2012

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion