Automatic analysis of natural language in online therapy transcripts.

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    What can automatic analysis of natural language in online mental health records and therapy transcripts tell us about treatment process and outcome?

  • IRAS ID

    141708

  • Contact name

    Michael King

  • Contact email

    michael.king@ucl.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University College London

  • Research summary

    This project aims to harness the potential of vast amounts of therapeutic data through the use of advanced linguistic analysis software. Developing patterns of analysis such as these allows for the processing of large volumes of data that could provide valuable insight into the process and outcome of online therapy. The linguistic analysis process will require the development of new query patterns adapted to this form of data and will provide structured results with which the research team will build predictive models of clinical outcomes to be tested and adjusted.
    Detailed analysis of the data will allow the researchers to develop models of textual patterns that predict 1) severity from questionnaire scores; 2) comorbidity with other disorders; 3) relationship with the therapist; 4) levels of risk (e.g. self-harm); 5) early termination of therapy and poor adherence.
    Refining and adapting an analysis method for this type of data has vast implications for the patient population involved. It would allow for real-time feedback on the progress of the individual and consequently transform the current approach to monitoring outcomes of treatment. It would allow a shift from questionnaire-based and therapist-led therapeutic decisions to patient-guided treatment.
    The study is secondary research and involves the use of two data sets. The first will be therapy transcripts collected during a clinical trial of online therapy and the second will be a set of therapy transcripts and other anonymised clinical data that are routinely collected by the therapy provider over the course of treatment. Each patient follows a course of approximately 10 sessions.

  • REC name

    London - Riverside Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/LO/1929

  • Date of REC Opinion

    10 Dec 2013

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion