Auditory evoked potentials as objective outcome measures V.1.

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Auditory evoked potentials as objective outcome measures in individuals with hearing devices

  • IRAS ID

    226216

  • Contact name

    Ghada BinKhamis

  • Contact email

    ghada.binkhamis@manchester.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    The University of Manchester

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    2 years, 4 months, 20 days

  • Research summary

    Current standard assessments used in the audiology clinic of a patients abilities to hear sounds, to understand conversations, and to understand conversations in a noisy environment (such as at a restaurant) with their hearing device (hearing aids or their cochlear implants) rely on the patient listening to sounds and reporting weather they heard them, on patients repeating words and sentences, and on patients repeating sentences presented in a background of noise.
    Not all patients are able to perform these tasks; for example, infants or young children and some individuals with disabilities are unable to inform the audiologist (hearing healthcare professional) how they are hearing with their hearing device nor are they able to report weather they heard a sound or repeat words and sentences.

    This study aims at developing an objective test (an auditory evoked potential response) of speech detection and speech understanding in background noise that can be used in the audiology clinic with patients that are unable to perform on current standard tests. This test would not require any cooperation or feedback from the patient.

    In order to achieve this goal, adults with hearing loss that use hearing aids or cochlear implants will be recruited through NHS audiology clinics in greater Manchester and asked to attend to visits at the University of Manchester. Standard clinical tests of speech understanding and other tests of hearing function will be utilised to compare their results to the auditory evoked potential test that is being developed in order to evaluate its’ potential use in audiology practice to evaluate detection of speech and understanding of speech in background noise in patients using hearing devices.

  • REC name

    East of England - Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    17/EE/0194

  • Date of REC Opinion

    16 May 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion