Are women having VBAC predisposed to sustaining OASIS?
Research type
Research Study
Full title
Are women having vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC) predisposed to sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)?
IRAS ID
186140
Contact name
Ash Monga
Contact email
Sponsor organisation
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Duration of Study in the UK
0 years, 3 months, 0 days
Research summary
During childbirth, the vagina stretches to enable the baby to be born. The entrance to the vagina and the perineum – the skin between the vagina and the anus – need to stretch to allow the baby to emerge. When the baby stretches the vagina during birth the skin of the perineum strains, which can lead to a perineal tear. A lot of women will tear to some extent – the majority are superficial and will heal by themselves. Very occasionally a tear can be more serious leading to longer term issues such as leakage of flatus (wind) and faeces (poo). This happens when a tear extends to affect the muscles of the back passage. These are referred to as OASIS (obstetric anal sphincter injuries). These types of injury are the main cause of anal leakage and urgency of passing faeces, and can have a significant effect on quality of life.
Some studies have also shown VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean) to be associated with an increased risk of OASIS compared with both women who have had previous vaginal births and those that have not. Sustaining an injury at VBAC has been found to be even more likely in women who require forceps to help deliver the baby. The limitation of these studies was that there was no analysis of the women’s baseline characteristics (e.g. age, ethnicity etc.) and circumstances of the first labour (e.g. why the woman had a caesaerean and whether it was planned or unplanned). It would therefore be worthwhile to investigate whether women having VBAC are at increased risk of sustaining OASIS and whether specific baseline characteristics and reason for caesarean delivery at first delivery make sustaining an OASIS at their next delivery more or less likely.REC name
North West - Preston Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
15/NW/0782
Date of REC Opinion
29 Sep 2015
REC opinion
Favourable Opinion