Accuscreen Equipment Evaluation For Newborn Hearing Screening

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Equipment Evaluation for Newborn Hearing Screening. A randomised comparison of screen outcome between standard Madsen ‘Accuscreen New’ and Madsen ‘Accuscreen New’ with fast refer disabled and increased test time

  • IRAS ID

    214416

  • Contact name

    John FitzGerald

  • Contact email

    john.fitzgerald@nnuh.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals NHS Trust

  • Duration of Study in the UK

    0 years, 4 months, 0 days

  • Research summary

    All newborn babies undergo hearing screening, usually within the first few days of life and some are tested with the automated auditory brainstem response test (AABR). This involves recording activity from the hearing nerve and parts of the brainstem from three small sensors placed on the baby’s head and neck when a series of clicking sounds are played in to the ear.

    In March 2015 we started using an ‘Accuscreen New’ to record the AABR, which is approved by the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) and used widely across the UK. However, since introducing the new equipment the ‘screen refer’ rate increased significantly in very young babies (less than 48 hours old) and diganostic testing showed they had satisfactory hearing. The impact of the increased referral rate caused increased delays on diagnostic testing and also lead to unnecessarily increased parental anxiety in relation to the hearing of their new born baby.

    The equipment suppliers (GN Otometrics) and the NHSP Programme centre have agreed to an evaluation and comparison of results between the ‘Accuscreen New’ currently in use and an ‘Accuscreen New’ with different settings which we believe will reduce uneccessary referrals of so many young babies to Audiology (the modified equipment will test for upto 10 minutes to see if a response is present, instead of stopping after one or two minutes).

    Babies will be tested with the standard and modified equipment. Referrals for diagnostic testing will be based on the standard equipment. A comparison in referrals between the standard and modified equipment will be made.

  • REC name

    East of Scotland Research Ethics Service REC 2

  • REC reference

    17/ES/0006

  • Date of REC Opinion

    2 Feb 2017

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion