AAR and manometry, the order of data collection

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    Anal Acoustic Reflectometry and manometry, the order of data collection.

  • IRAS ID

    128558

  • Contact name

    Karen Telford

  • Contact email

    karen.telford@uhsm.nhs.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    University Hospital South Manchester

  • Research summary

    Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) is a new technique that uses sound waves to measure properties of the anal canal. It is the best method we have to assess the natural function of the anal canal. AAR tells us the cross sectional area along the length of the canal while it is being opended by inflating a balloon. The assessment mimics opening and closing of the anal canal and the effect of squeezing the muscles. This information has never been available before.\n\nHistorically the gold standard investigation of the anal canal has been manometry which measures maximum resting and maximum squeeze pressures. However, it has significant limitations. Despite these 2 measurements being within normal ranges patients can still have significant symptoms of faecal incontinence, prompting clinicians to search for a better investigation to guide management in this difficult patient group.\n\nAAR has already shown promise in the assessment of faecal incontinence. Our previous studies have shown it to be a reproducible and reliable technique that, unlike manometry, is able to distinguish between different symptomatic subgroups with faecal incontinence and also correlate with symptom severity.\n\nWe propose a new study thats aims to further validate our methodology. We plan to measure AAR and manometry in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. We want to know if the order of carrying out AAR and manometry affects the results. Patients will therefore be randomised to manometry then AAR or AAR then manometry.

  • REC name

    North West - Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    13/NW/0469

  • Date of REC Opinion

    18 Jul 2013

  • REC opinion

    Favourable Opinion