A Phase I/II Study of WX-554 in Solid Tumours

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A Phase I/II, open-label, dose-escalation study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity of the MEK inhibitor WX-554 in patients with solid tumours

  • IRAS ID

    94784

  • Contact name

    Elizabeth Ruth Plummer

  • Contact email

    Ruth.Plummer@newcastle.ac.uk

  • Sponsor organisation

    WILEX AG

  • Eudract number

    2011-003408-19

  • ISRCTN Number

    N/A

  • Research summary

    The purpose of this study is to test the safety of WX-554 (a MEK inhibitor) and see what effects it has on patients with solid tumours. Analysis of this drug in the lab suggests that it could have an anti-cancer effect. The study has a Part 1 and a Part 2. Part 1 (escalation phase) of the study will investigate increasing dose levels of study drug with the aim of identifying the Optimal Biological Dose (OBD) or the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), whichever is identified first. The OBD is the dose which shows the most inhibition of the cell pathway (the target). The MTD is the highest safe dose for a person receiving study drug. The OBD/MTD dose level(s) identified in Part 1 will be taken into Part 2 (expansion phase) and further evaluated. Adjustments to the dose level and frequency of drug administration may be investigated in Part 2 of the study. If the OBD is taken into Part 2, further dose levels may continue to be investigated in Part 1, thus Part 1 and Part 2 of the study may run in parallel. The length of time in this study depends on how well patients tolerate the study drug. Patients can have as many cycles of 3 weeks as they can tolerate without unacceptable side effects. There will be a screening period of up to 2 weeks prior to treatment and follow up at one week and then at 30 days after last study drug administration.

  • REC name

    North East - Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    11/NE/0376

  • Date of REC Opinion

    25 Jan 2012

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion