798-110 GIRAFFE Paediatric patients with overactive bladder

  • Research type

    Research Study

  • Full title

    A multicenter, open-label, single ascending dose study to evaluate pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of solifenacin succinate suspension in pediatric patients aged 5 to 17 years (inclusive) with Overactive Bladder (OAB)

  • IRAS ID

    55033

  • Contact name

    Daniel Carroll

  • Sponsor organisation

    Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

  • Eudract number

    2009-017197-21

  • ISRCTN Number

    0

  • Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier

    0

  • Research summary

    The aim of this study is to look at what happens to the study drug, solifenacin succinate suspension, in the body after a single-dose has been given at different dose levels to children and adolescents with Overactive Bladder (OAB). OAB is a syndrome affecting the filling of the bladder leading to a sudden, unexpected and immediate need to urinate. Symptoms can also include urge incontinence which is the uncontrollable leakage of urine when they feeling the urge to urinate. Patients may also urinate more frequently than normal. Some current standard treatments can result in significant side effects and are used off-label for paediatric use, although there are some drugs available that have been approved for paediatric use. Existing therapies show there is a need for new, different and innovative treatments and the treatment in this study has the advantage of a single daily dose. The study drug, solifenacin (trade name Vesicare©), is currently marketed as a tablet for adult use for the treatment of urge incontinence and/or increased frequency and urgency to urinate as may occur in OAB. Tablets are not suitable for treating children/adolescents, therefore the sponsor (Astellas) has developed an oral liquid, which will be used for clinical trials in all age groups, and finally for commercial use.

  • REC name

    North West - Haydock Research Ethics Committee

  • REC reference

    10/H1010/38

  • Date of REC Opinion

    24 Aug 2010

  • REC opinion

    Further Information Favourable Opinion