192024-050: Bimatoprost/Timolol PF compared with Ganfort
Research type
Research Study
Full title
A Multicenter, Double-masked, Randomized, Parallel Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Preservative-free Ophthalmic Solution Compared with GANFORT® (bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution) Once Daily for 12 weeks in Patients with Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.
IRAS ID
62267
Contact name
Kin Sheng Lim
Sponsor organisation
Allergan LTD
Eudract number
2010-021507-24
ISRCTN Number
n/a
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier
Research summary
GANFORT©, a fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.03% and timolol 0.5% (hereafter referred to as GANFORT), is approved in more than 45 countries worldwide including European countries for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OHT). Bimatoprost and timolol, each as an single agent, are approved worldwide for the lowering of elevated IOP and have well established safety and efficacy profiles as monotherapies in the treatment of patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Allergan is developing a preservative-free formulation of GANFORT that differs from GANFORT only in that benzalkonium chloride (BAK) has been removed. It is not anticipated that the removal in the preservative-free (PF) formulation of the small amount of BAK, 50 ppm, will have any clinically significant effect on the IOP-lowering effect. The removal of preservative may improve tolerability in some patients while maintaining IOP-lowering efficacy. A single-use container of PF formulation is expected to provide convenience for patient use. The specific purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% Preservative-free ophthalmic solution compared to GANFORT in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. A general purpose of the study is to use the study data to develop a better understanding of diseases capable of being treated with bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% PF ophthalmic solution or similar drugs, and to assist in the designing of future clinical trials in evaluating the potential for future development of the product.
REC name
London - Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee
REC reference
10/H0806/99
Date of REC Opinion
17 Nov 2010
REC opinion
Further Information Favourable Opinion