Our people make us and all play a crucial role in our achievements
Our staff
264 people working in our offices in Bristol, London, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham and from home.
Our Board
We are governed by a Board composed of five non-executive directors, including the Chair, and three Executive Directors.
Research Ethics Committees
There are 85 Research Ethics Committees (RECs) across the UK, with 1143 members volunteering their time to review research. Each REC includes a mixture of expert and lay members, including people with experience of research. The HRA is responsible for the 64 English committees and works closely with those in Scotland, Wales and NI.
- England: 64 RECs, 825 members
- Scotland: 12 RECs, 172 members
- Wales: 7 RECs, 107 members
- NI: 2 RECs, 39 members
Together these committees approve 4000-5000 applications a year, plus around 9000 amendments (where researchers want to make substantial changes to their study after approval).
Each REC member gives 18-24 days a year of their time to read and review research proposals and attend meetings to ensure that research involving people, their tissue or data meets ethical standards.
The Confidentiality Advisory Group
CAG was set up in 2013 to provide independent expert advice to the HRA (for research applications) and the Secretary of State for Health (for non-research applications) on whether applications to access patient information without consent should or should not be approved. The HRA or Secretary of State takes the final approval decision. CAG also advises NHS Digital, on request, on the use of identifiable information.
26 members, including experts from a range of different fields and lay members, who together bring a diversity of perspectives, insights and expertise to the committee
Approves around 140 applications a year in a median of 30 days.
Reference
Based on performance in 2021-22 financial year to date, figures from April to July 2021
Technical Assurance
We work with 226 Technical Assurance reviewers across both pharmacy and radiation assurance. In 2021/22 they will complete about 300 reviews. The majority of our reviewers work in the NHS/HSC and have direct experience of the potential challenges faced when setting up a study.
Our Public Involvement Network
91 members including patients, carers and members of the public.
Members of the network help us to recruit staff at the HRA, re-design and develop content for our website and work with us to develop and deliver staff training. By involving and listening to the views of patients and the public, we help to ensure they are placed at the centre of what we do.
The National Research and Ethics Advisor’s Panel
This panel of experts in a wide range of disciplines related to health research including bioethics, medical research, patients and public involvement and RECs provides advice to the HRA.
Professor Sir Terence Stephenson, Chair, Health Research Authority'Health and social care research benefits all of us. The HRA is crucial to this – protecting people who take part in research and making it easier for researchers to do cutting-edge research in the UK.
The HRA’s first decade has been one of consistency and assurance, rationalisation and proportionality. And this hard work has enabled it to respond rapidly to the COVID-19 pandemic with a fast track approvals service for urgent COVID-19 research. We reduced the average research review timelines by 90%, from 62 to 5 days for HRA Approval, enabling over 700 COVID-19 research studies to take place faster.
As the HRA heads towards its teenage years, we will build on our successes and improve the quality of all research by making patients and the public true partners in research and innovation. Because today’s research is tomorrow’s treatments.'
Ian Cook, Director of Transformation and Corporate Services'I have had the privilege of working at the HRA for all of its 10 years, and was also fortunate to be part of the team that established it a decade ago.
The contribution of all that work here has been immense, but I particularly have to call out the work of the volunteers who sit on REC and CAG committees and who review so carefully and professionally health research applications. Also those who make up our Public Involvement Network, who bring a critically important perspective on ensuring that the voice of patients and the wider public is fully part of the way the HRA works.'
Ann Tunley, Head of Approvals'The establishment of the HRA made it possible to create the HRA ‘family’. This allowed us to keep developing and improving the Research Ethics Service and work together on introducing and refining the integrated process for HRA Approval that we have today.
It won’t stop there, of course, but will continue to improve and evolve for the benefit of researchers and research. I am proud to have been a small part of this.'
Natasha Dunkley, Head of Confidentiality Advice Service'I am proud to work with so many members and staff within and outside of the HRA that have a genuine passion for helping to make sure patients maintain confidence in the use of patient data for high quality research and planning purposes.
Knowing that I work on confidentiality issues that matter to people right now makes this a really exciting and motivating reason to start each day!'
Matt Rogerson, (they/them) Research Regulation Officer'Since I joined the HRA in 2015, the work I am most proud of is being part of the team that approved the PrEP Impact trial, which brought the life-changing PrEP drug to around 26,000 people living with HIV in the UK.'
Juliana Araújo, Approvals Specialist'I feel extremely proud to see that we have done so much more than we thought we could accomplish in the last 10 years. Now, I can only hope that in the years to come we can still support our researchers to continue to develop vaccines and treatments capable of saving the world.'
Pamela Micallef, Mainline Operator/Administrator'I enjoy my role here immensely and every time I answer the phone, I remember that I am probably the first person at the HRA the caller may speak with. I therefore want to make their contact with us a positive, professional experience. I am proud of the work our organisation does in helping to make our country a world class leader in research.'
Paula G Myers, Finance and Estates Contract Manager'I work in the Finance department, working on Finance and Estates. My proudest moment is my part in making sure we meet our Better Payment Practice Code. This means that we aim to pay at least 95 per cent of invoices within the agreed terms, of 30 days, unless there is a dispute.'
Barbara Molony-Oates Public Involvement Manager'I was attracted to the HRA because we place public involvement at the centre of our mission to protect and promote the interests of people taking part in research.
I was particularly impressed by my manager’s response to my request for adjustments to support me due to my disabilities for my interview. Having a member of the Public Involvement network, and the HRA Equality Diversity and Inclusion manager on the interview panel reinforced my impression of the HRA as a truly inclusive employer.'
Raj Khullar, Approvals Officer'My proudest moment while working at the HRA is when I met a research participant who told me:
‘Knowing that an organisation like HRA exists makes me feel confident to take part in research. It is only after observing an Ethics Committee meeting that I decided to take part in research.’
Dr Hugh Davies Chair, South Central Oxford A Research Ethics Committee'I’ve served on “the good ship HRA” and its predecessors for many decades and am now chair of Oxford A REC. Throughout my time, the HRA and its members have tried to set high standards of review and then measure and check performance.
We have been our own critic through our operations and audit departments and amongst ourselves through the Shared Ethical Debate programme. I’d argue that this has helped us set an example of good practice, which has been the envy of others in this field.
Special thanks to Janet Wisely for her balanced and pragmatic leadership and those in our training team. Floreat HRA.'
Paul Gorczynski, PhD, CPsychol, AFBPsS Expert member of London-Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee'I've been an expert member of London-Bloomsbury since 2016, and chair since 2021. I've had the pleasure of meeting and working with incredibly talented individuals from so many different areas of life. Everyone I have worked with at London-Bloomsbury has truly expressed a passion for the work of ethical review.'
Ms Zainab Yate, Biomedical Ethicist & Independent Researcher, Vice-Chair of Brent Research Ethics Committee'I sit on a London panel with such a wide range of experts and insights when reviewing research protocols, every meeting is very interesting and rewarding to attend.
I am proud and honoured to be part of a dedicated committee with members who are genuinely committed to supporting the aims of the research ethics service.'
Stephanie Ellis, BEM. Chair, Cambridge Central, Hampstead and the Special Ad-hoc (for COVID challenge studies) Research Ethics Committees'I have been involved with Research Ethics Committees (RECs) for 32 years now. So, for me HRA is newcomer: a welcome one that has done good work – long may it continue.
What has made me proud to be involved? When a researcher admitted that she had struggled to write her application. She had come to us thinking we were a barrier to be got round and found we saw our job as being to help foster good research.
Most people don’t know about us. Which is a shame, because we do important work: we help to make sure that the research done in the UK is first class.'
Professor Lorna Fraser, Director of the Martin House Research Centre, University of York. Member of the Confidentiality Advisory Group'I am really proud to be a member of the Confidentiality Advisory Group of the HRA.
The COVID-19 pandemic has shown how vital having high quality routinely collected data is and how quickly it can be used to inform patient care, public health interventions and policy for the immediate benefit to the public and patients. If the HRA and CAG infrastructure were not in existence before the pandemic, then the vital COVID-19 research would not have been able to have been conducted in a such timely manner.
I hope that we can learn from the rapid processes that happened during the pandemic to improve and streamline approvals in the future.'
Amander Wellings, PPI Consultant, Service User/Carer, Neuro Diverse, Alumni of National Institute of Health Research INVOLVE Advisory Group.'I really value working with the Health Research Authority and am valued in return. Its work with the public is never a box tick exercise.
If we can get Public Involvement good practice at organisational level, then it will mean a better experience for those participating in research, whether participants or public members working with research teams as equal partners. Research becomes accessible and benefits the public more.'
Neelam Patel, CEO MedCity, Non-Executive Director, Health Research Authority'I joined the HRA in April 2021, so what was at the forefront in my mind was the vaccine programme. It was incredible to hear the HRA’s role in simplifying the process of doing research by joining up the multiple agencies and institutions involved to facilitate collaboration and harmonisation. The value of this was realised in our rapid response to the pandemic and ability to get safe vaccines from the bench to patients in a timeframe never before thought possible.'
Professor Andrew George, Non-Executive Director, Health Research Authority, Former Chair of the National Research Ethics Advisors’ Panel'The HRA is fortunate in being able to call on academics, patients, public and other stakeholders to help it develop policy and guidelines that improve the ethics of clinical and social care research.'